您的位置 : 首页 > 英文著作
Is Shakespeare Dead?
CHAPTER III
Mark Twain
下载:Is Shakespeare Dead?.txt
本书全文检索:
       _ III
       How curious and interesting is the parallel--as far as
       poverty of biographical details is concerned--between Satan and
       Shakespeare. It is wonderful, it is unique, it stands quite
       alone, there is nothing resembling it in history, nothing
       resembling it in romance, nothing approaching it even in
       tradition. How sublime is their position, and how over-topping,
       how sky-reaching, how supreme--the two Great Unknowns, the two
       Illustrious Conjecturabilities! They are the best-known unknown
       persons that have ever drawn breath upon the planet.
       For the instruction of the ignorant I will make a list, now,
       of those details of Shakespeare's history which are FACTS--
       verified facts, established facts, undisputed facts.
        
       Facts
       He was born on the 23d of April, 1564.
       Of good farmer-class parents who could not read, could not
       write, could not sign their names.
       At Stratford, a small back settlement which in that day was
       shabby and unclean, and densely illiterate. Of the nineteen
       important men charged with the government of the town, thirteen
       had to "make their mark" in attesting important documents,
       because they could not write their names.
       Of the first eighteen years of his life NOTHING is known.
       They are a blank.
       On the 27th of November (1582) William Shakespeare took out
       a license to marry Anne Whateley.
       Next day William Shakespeare took out a license to marry
       Anne Hathaway. She was eight years his senior.
       William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway. In a hurry. By
       grace of a reluctantly granted dispensation there was but one
       publication of the banns.
       Within six months the first child was born.
       About two (blank) years followed, during which period
       NOTHING AT ALL HAPPENED TO SHAKESPEARE, so far as anybody knows.
       Then came twins--1585. February.
       Two blank years follow.
       Then--1587--he makes a ten-year visit to London, leaving the family behind.
       Five blank years follow. During this period NOTHING
       HAPPENED TO HIM, as far as anybody actually knows.
       Then--1592--there is mention of him as an actor.
       Next year--1593--his name appears in the official list of players.
       Next year--1594--he played before the queen. A detail of no
       consequence: other obscurities did it every year of the forty-
       five of her reign. And remained obscure.
       Three pretty full years follow. Full of play-acting. Then
       In 1597 he bought New Place, Stratford.
       Thirteen or fourteen busy years follow; years in which he
       accumulated money, and also reputation as actor and manager.
       Meantime his name, liberally and variously spelt, had
       become associated with a number of great plays and poems, as
       (ostensibly) author of the same.
       Some of these, in these years and later, were pirated, but
       he made no protest.
       Then--1610-11--he returned to Stratford and settled down for
       good and all, and busied himself in lending money, trading in
       tithes, trading in land and houses; shirking a debt of forty-one
       shillings, borrowed by his wife during his long desertion of his
       family; suing debtors for shillings and coppers; being sued
       himself for shillings and coppers; and acting as confederate to a
       neighbor who tried to rob the town of its rights in a certain
       common, and did not succeed.
       He lived five or six years--till 1616--in the joy of these
       elevated pursuits. Then he made a will, and signed each of its
       three pages with his name.
       A thoroughgoing business man's will. It named in minute
       detail every item of property he owned in the world--houses,
       lands, sword, silver-gilt bowl, and so on--all the way down to
       his "second-best bed" and its furniture.
       It carefully and calculatingly distributed his riches among
       the members of his family, overlooking no individual of it. Not
       even his wife: the wife he had been enabled to marry in a hurry
       by urgent grace of a special dispensation before he was nineteen;
       the wife whom he had left husbandless so many years; the wife who
       had had to borrow forty-one shillings in her need, and which the
       lender was never able to collect of the prosperous husband, but
       died at last with the money still lacking. No, even this wife
       was remembered in Shakespeare's will.
       He left her that "second-best bed."
       And NOT ANOTHER THING; not even a penny to bless her lucky
       widowhood with.
       It was eminently and conspicuously a business man's will,
       not a poet's.
       It mentioned NOT A SINGLE BOOK.
       Books were much more precious than swords and silver-gilt
       bowls and second-best beds in those days, and when a departing
       person owned one he gave it a high place in his will.
       The will mentioned NOT A PLAY, NOT A POEM, NOT AN UNFINISHED
       LITERARY WORK, NOT A SCRAP OF MANUSCRIPT OF ANY KIND.
       Many poets have died poor, but this is the only one in
       history that has died THIS poor; the others all left literary
       remains behind. Also a book. Maybe two.
       If Shakespeare had owned a dog--but we not go into that: we
       know he would have mentioned it in his will. If a good dog,
       Susanna would have got it; if an inferior one his wife would have
       got a downer interest in it. I wish he had had a dog, just so we
       could see how painstakingly he would have divided that dog among
       the family, in his careful business way.
       He signed the will in three places.
       In earlier years he signed two other official documents.
       These five signatures still exist.
       There are NO OTHER SPECIMENS OF HIS PENMANSHIP IN EXISTENCE.
       Not a line.
       Was he prejudiced against the art? His granddaughter, whom
       he loved, was eight years old when he died, yet she had had no
       teaching, he left no provision for her education, although he was
       rich, and in her mature womanhood she couldn't write and couldn't
       tell her husband's manuscript from anybody else's--she thought it
       was Shakespeare's.
       When Shakespeare died in Stratford, IT WAS NOT AN EVENT. It
       made no more stir in England than the death of any other
       forgotten theater-actor would have made. Nobody came down from
       London; there were no lamenting poems, no eulogies, no national
       tears--there was merely silence, and nothing more. A striking
       contrast with what happened when Ben Jonson, and Francis Bacon,
       and Spenser, and Raleigh, and the other distinguished literary
       folk of Shakespeare's time passed from life! No praiseful voice
       was lifted for the lost Bard of Avon; even Ben Jonson waited
       seven years before he lifted his.
       SO FAR AS ANYBODY ACTUALLY KNOWS AND CAN PROVE, Shakespeare
       of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a play in his life.
       SO FAR AS ANY ONE KNOWS, HE RECEIVED ONLY ONE LETTER
       DURING HIS LIFE.
       So far as any one KNOWS AND CAN PROVE, Shakespeare of
       Stratford wrote only one poem during his life. This one is
       authentic. He did write that one--a fact which stands
       undisputed; he wrote the whole of it; he wrote the whole of it
       out of his own head. He commanded that this work of art be
       engraved upon his tomb, and he was obeyed. There it abides to
       this day. This is it:
       Good friend for Iesus sake forbeare
       To digg the dust encloased heare:
       Blest be ye man yt spares thes stones
       And curst be he yt moves my bones.
       In the list as above set down will be found EVERY POSITIVELY
       KNOWN fact of Shakespeare's life, lean and meager as the invoice
       is. Beyond these details we know NOT A THING about him. All the
       rest of his vast history, as furnished by the biographers, is
       built up, course upon course, of guesses, inferences, theories,
       conjectures--an Eiffel Tower of artificialities rising sky-high
       from a very flat and very thin foundation of inconsequential
       facts. _