您的位置 : 首页 > 英文著作
Essays, Second Series
V. GIFTS
Ralph Waldo Emerson
下载:Essays, Second Series.txt
本书全文检索:
       _ GIFTS.
       Gifts of one who loved me,--
       'T was high time they came;
       When he ceased to love me,
       Time they stopped for shame.
       V. GIFTS.
       IT is said that the world is in a state of bankruptcy;
       that the world owes the world more than the world can
       pay, and ought to go into chancery and be sold. I do
       not think this general insolvency, which involves in
       some sort all the population, to be the reason of the
       difficulty experienced at Christmas and New Year and
       other times, in bestowing gifts; since it is always
       so pleasant to be generous, though very vexatious to
       pay debts. But the impediment lies in the choosing.
       If at any time it comes into my head that a present
       is due from me to somebody, I am puzzled what to give,
       until the opportunity is gone. Flowers and fruits are
       always fit presents; flowers, because they are a proud
       assertion that a ray of beauty outvalues all the
       utilities of the world. These gay natures contrast with
       the somewhat stern countenance of ordinary nature: they
       are like music heard out of a work-house. Nature does
       not cocker us; we are children, not pets; she is not
       fond; everything is dealt to us without fear or favor,
       after severe universal laws. Yet these delicate flowers
       look like the frolic and interference of love and beauty.
       Men use to tell us that we love flattery even though we
       are not deceived by it, because it shows that we are of
       importance enough to be courted. Something like that
       pleasure, the flowers give us: what am I to whom these
       sweet hints are addressed? Fruits are acceptable gifts,
       because they are the flower of commodities, and admit
       of fantastic values being attached to them. If a man
       should send to me to come a hundred miles to visit him
       and should set before me a basket of fine summer-fruit,
       I should think there was some proportion between the
       labor and the reward.
       For common gifts, necessity makes pertinences and
       beauty every day, and one is glad when an imperative
       leaves him no option; since if the man at the door
       have no shoes, you have not to consider whether you
       could procure him a paint-box. And as it is always
       pleasing to see a man eat bread, or drink water, in
       the house or out of doors, so it is always a great
       satisfaction to supply these first wants. Necessity
       does everything well. In our condition of universal
       dependence it seems heroic to let the petitioner be
       the judge of his necessity, and to give all that is
       asked, though at great inconvenience. If it be a
       fantastic desire, it is better to leave to others
       the office of punishing him. I can think of many
       parts I should prefer playing to that of the Furies.
       Next to things of necessity, the rule for a gift,
       which one of my friends prescribed, is that we might
       convey to some person that which properly belonged
       to his character, and was easily associated with
       him in thought. But our tokens of compliment and
       love are for the most part barbarous. Rings and
       other jewels are not gifts, but apologies for gifts.
       The only gift is a portion of thyself. Thou must
       bleed for me. Therefore the poet brings his poem;
       the shepherd, his lamb; the farmer, corn; the miner,
       a gem; the sailor, coral and shells; the painter,
       his picture; the girl, a handkerchief of her own
       sewing. This is right and pleasing, for it restores
       society in so far to its primary basis, when a man's
       biography is conveyed in his gift, and every man's
       wealth is an index of his merit. But it is a cold
       lifeless business when you go to the shops to buy me
       something which does not represent your life and
       talent, but a goldsmith's. This is fit for kings,
       and rich men who represent kings, and a false state
       of property, to make presents of gold and silver
       stuffs, as a kind of symbolical sin-offering, or
       payment of black-mail.
       The law of benefits is a difficult channel, which
       requires careful sailing, or rude boats. It is not
       the office of a man to receive gifts. How dare you
       give them? We wish to be self-sustained. We do not
       quite forgive a giver. The hand that feeds us is in
       some danger of being bitten. We can receive anything
       from love, for that is a way of receiving it from
       ourselves; but not from any one who assumes to bestow.
       We sometimes hate the meat which we eat, because there
       seems something of degrading dependence in living
       by it:--
       "Brother, if Jove to thee a present make,
       Take heed that from his hands thou nothing take."
       We ask the whole. Nothing less will content us. We
       arraign society if it do not give us, besides earth
       and fire and water, opportunity, love, reverence,
       and objects of veneration.
       He is a good man who can receive a gift well. We
       are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both emotions
       are unbecoming. Some violence I think is done, some
       degradation borne, when I rejoice or grieve at a gift.
       I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a
       gift comes from such as do not know my spirit, and so
       the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
       overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor
       should read my heart, and see that I love his commodity,
       and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing
       of the giver unto me, correspondent to my flowing unto
       him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass
       to him, and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his.
       I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil or
       this flagon of wine when all your oil and wine is mine,
       which belief of mine this gift seems to deny? Hence
       the fitness of beautiful, not useful things, for gifts.
       This giving is flat usurpation, and therefore when the
       beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate
       all Timons, not at all considering the value of the
       gift but looking back to the greater store it was taken
       from,--I rather sympathize with the beneficiary than
       with the anger of my lord Timon. For the expectation of
       gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the
       total insensibility of the obliged person. It is a great
       happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning
       from one who has had the ill-luck to be served by you.
       It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and
       the debtor naturally wishes to give you a slap. A golden
       text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
       Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter
       your benefactors."
       The reason of these discords I conceive to be that
       there is no commensurability between a man and any
       gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous
       person. After you have served him he at once puts
       you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man
       renders his friend is trivial and selfish compared
       with the service he knows his friend stood in
       readiness to yield him, alike before he had begun
       to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with
       that good-will I bear my friend, the benefit it is
       in my power to render him seems small. Besides, our
       action on each other, good as well as evil, is so
       incidental and at random that we can seldom hear
       the acknowledgments of any person who would thank
       us for a benefit, without some shame and humiliation.
       We can rarely strike a direct stroke, but must be
       content with an oblique one; we seldom have the
       satisfaction of yielding a direct benefit which is
       directly received. But rectitude scatters favors on
       every side without knowing it, and receives with
       wonder the thanks of all people.
       I fear to breathe any treason against the majesty
       of love, which is the genius and god of gifts, and
       to whom we must not affect to prescribe. Let him
       give kingdoms or flower-leaves indifferently. There
       are persons from whom we always expect fairy-tokens;
       let us not cease to expect them. This is prerogative,
       and not to be limited by our municipal rules. For
       the rest, I like to see that we cannot be bought and
       sold. The best of hospitality and of generosity is
       also not in the will, but in fate. I find that I am
       not much to you; you do not need me; you do not feel
       me; then am I thrust out of doors, though you proffer
       me house and lands. No services are of any value, but
       only likeness. When I have attempted to join myself to
       others by services, it proved an intellectual trick,--
       no more. They eat your service like apples, and leave
       you out. But love them, and they feel you and delight
       in you all the time. _