您的位置 : 首页 > 英文著作
How to Live on 24 Hours a Day
Preface
Arnold Bennett
下载:How to Live on 24 Hours a Day.txt
本书全文检索:
       _ This preface, though placed at the beginning, as a preface must be,
       should be read at the end of the book.
       I have received a large amount of correspondence concerning this
       small work, and many reviews of it--some of them nearly as long
       as the book itself--have been printed. But scarcely any of the
       comment has been adverse. Some people have objected to a
       frivolity of tone; but as the tone is not, in my opinion, at all
       frivolous, this objection did not impress me; and had no weightier
       reproach been put forward I might almost have been persuaded that
       the volume was flawless! A more serious stricture has, however,
       been offered--not in the press, but by sundry obviously sincere
       correspondents--and I must deal with it. A reference to page 43
       will show that I anticipated and feared this disapprobation. The
       sentence against which protests have been made is as follows:--
       "In the majority of instances he [the typical man] does not
       precisely feel a passion for his business; at best he does not dislike
       it. He begins his business functions with some reluctance, as late
       as he can, and he ends them with joy, as early as he can. And his
       engines, while he is engaged in his business, are seldom at their
       full 'h.p.'"
       I am assured, in accents of unmistakable sincerity, that there are
       many business men--not merely those in high positions or with fine
       prospects, but modest subordinates with no hope of ever being
       much better off--who do enjoy their business functions, who do not
       shirk them, who do not arrive at the office as late as possible and
       depart as early as possible, who, in a word, put the whole of their
       force into their day's work and are genuinely fatigued at the end
       thereof.
       I am ready to believe it. I do believe it. I know it. I always knew
       it. Both in London and in the provinces it has been my lot to spend
       long years in subordinate situations of business; and the fact did
       not escape me that a certain proportion of my peers showed what
       amounted to an honest passion for their duties, and that while
       engaged in those duties they were really *living* to the fullest
       extent of which they were capable. But I remain convinced that
       these fortunate and happy individuals (happier perhaps than they
       guessed) did not and do not constitute a majority, or anything like
       a majority. I remain convinced that the majority of decent average
       conscientious men of business (men with aspirations and ideals) do
       not as a rule go home of a night genuinely tired. I remain
       convinced that they put not as much but as little of themselves as
       they conscientiously can into the earning of a livelihood, and that
       their vocation bores rather than interests them.
       Nevertheless, I admit that the minority is of sufficient importance
       to merit attention, and that I ought not to have ignored it so
       completely as I did do. The whole difficulty of the hard-working
       minority was put in a single colloquial sentence by one of my
       correspondents. He wrote: "I am just as keen as anyone on doing
       something to 'exceed my programme,' but allow me to tell you that
       when I get home at six thirty p.m. I am not anything like so fresh
       as you seem to imagine."
       Now I must point out that the case of the minority, who throw
       themselves with passion and gusto into their daily business task, is
       infinitely less deplorable than the case of the majority, who go
       half-heartedly and feebly through their official day. The former are
       less in need of advice "how to live." At any rate during their
       official day of, say, eight hours they are really alive; their engines
       are giving the full indicated "h.p." The other eight working hours
       of their day may be badly organised, or even frittered away; but it
       is less disastrous to waste eight hours a day than sixteen hours a
       day; it is better to have lived a bit than never to have lived at all.
       The real tragedy is the tragedy of the man who is braced to effort
       neither in the office nor out of it, and to this man this book is
       primarily addressed. "But," says the other and more fortunate man,
       "although my ordinary programme is bigger than his, I want to
       exceed my programme too! I am living a bit; I want to live more.
       But I really can't do another day's work on the top of my official
       day."
       The fact is, I, the author, ought to have foreseen that I should
       appeal most strongly to those who already had an interest in
       existence. It is always the man who has tasted life who demands
       more of it. And it is always the man who never gets out of bed
       who is the most difficult to rouse.
       Well, you of the minority, let us assume that the intensity of your
       daily money-getting will not allow you to carry out quite all the
       suggestions in the following pages. Some of the suggestions may
       yet stand. I admit that you may not be able to use the time spent
       on the journey home at night; but the suggestion for the journey to
       the office in the morning is as practicable for you as for anybody.
       And that weekly interval of forty hours, from Saturday to Monday,
       is yours just as much as the other man's, though a slight
       accumulation of fatigue may prevent you from employing the
       whole of your "h.p." upon it. There remains, then, the important
       portion of the three or more evenings a week. You tell me flatly
       that you are too tired to do anything outside your programme at
       night. In reply to which I tell you flatly that if your ordinary day's
       work is thus exhausting, then the balance of your life is wrong and
       must be adjusted. A man's powers ought not to be monopolised by
       his ordinary day's work. What, then, is to be done?
       The obvious thing to do is to circumvent your ardour for your
       ordinary day's work by a ruse. Employ your engines in something
       beyond the programme before, and not after, you employ them on
       the programme itself. Briefly, get up earlier in the morning. You
       say you cannot. You say it is impossible for you to go earlier to
       bed of a night--to do so would upset the entire household. I do not
       think it is quite impossible to go to bed earlier at night. I think that
       if you persist in rising earlier, and the consequence is insufficiency
       of sleep, you will soon find a way of going to bed earlier. But my
       impression is that the consequences of rising earlier will not be an
       insufficiency of sleep. My impression, growing stronger every
       year, is that sleep is partly a matter of habit--and of slackness. I am
       convinced that most people sleep as long as they do because they
       are at a loss for any other diversion. How much sleep do you think
       is daily obtained by the powerful healthy man who daily rattles up
       your street in charge of Carter Patterson's van? I have consulted a
       doctor on this point. He is a doctor who for twenty-four years has
       had a large general practice in a large flourishing suburb of
       London, inhabited by exactly such people as you and me. He is a
       curt man, and his answer was curt:
       "Most people sleep themselves stupid."
       He went on to give his opinion that nine men out of ten would have
       better health and more fun out of life if they spent less time in bed.
       Other doctors have confirmed this judgment, which, of course, does
       not apply to growing youths.
       Rise an hour, an hour and a half, or even two hours earlier; and--if
       you must--retire earlier when you can. In the matter of exceeding
       programmes, you will accomplish as much in one morning hour as
       in two evening hours. "But," you say, "I couldn't begin without
       some food, and servants." Surely, my dear sir, in an age when an
       excellent spirit-lamp (including a saucepan) can be bought for less
       than a shilling, you are not going to allow your highest welfare to
       depend upon the precarious immediate co-operation of a fellow
       creature! Instruct the fellow creature, whoever she may be, at
       night. Tell her to put a tray in a suitable position over night. On
       that tray two biscuits, a cup and saucer, a box of matches and a
       spirit-lamp; on the lamp, the saucepan; on the saucepan, the lid--
       but turned the wrong way up; on the reversed lid, the small teapot,
       containing a minute quantity of tea leaves. You will then have to
       strike a match--that is all. In three minutes the water boils, and you
       pour it into the teapot (which is already warm). In three more minutes
       the tea is infused. You can begin your day while drinking it. These
       details may seem trivial to the foolish, but to the thoughtful they will
       not seem trivial. The proper, wise balancing of one's whole life may
       depend upon the feasibility of a cup of tea at an unusual hour.
       Arnold Bennett. _